Evolutionary methods for the design of dispatching rules for complex and dynamic scheduling problems

Three methods, based on Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs), to support and automate the design of dispatching rules for complex and dynamic scheduling problems are proposed in this thesis. The first method employs an EA to search for problem instances on which a given dispatching rule performs badly. These instances can then be analysed to reveal weaknesses of the tested rule, thereby providing guidelines for the design of a better rule. The other two methods are hyper-heuristics, which employ an EA directly to generate effective dispatching rules. In particular, one hyper-heuristic is based on a specific type of EA, called Genetic Programming (GP), and generates a single rule from basic job and machine attributes, while the other generates a set of work centre-specific rules by selecting a (potentially) different rule for each work centre from a number of existing rules. Each of the three methods is applied to some complex and dynamic scheduling problem(s), and the resulting dispatching rules are tested against benchmark rules from the literature. In each case, the benchmark rules are shown to be outperformed by a rule (set) that results from the application of the respective method, which demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed methods

Evolutionary search for difficult problem instances to support the design of job shop dispatching rules

Dispatching rules are simple scheduling heuristics that are widely applied in industrial practice. Their popularity can be attributed to their ability to flexibly react to shop floor disruptions that are prevalent in many real-world manufacturing environments. However, it is a challenging and time-consuming task to design local, decentralised dispatching rules that result in a good global performance of a complex shop. An evolutionary algorithm is developed to generate job shop problem instances for which an examined dispatching rule fails to achieve a good solution due to a single suboptimal decision. These instances can be easily analysed to reveal limitations of that rule which helps with the design of better rules. The method is applied to a job shop problem from the literature, resulting in new best dispatching rules for the mean flow time measure. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

Setup-oriented dispatching rules – a survey

This paper provides a survey of dispatching rules that explicitly take into account setup times in their decision making. Rules are classified into the categories of purely setup-oriented, composite and family-based rules, and the most promising rules from the three categories are identified from the literature. These rules are then compared empirically on various job shop problems with sequence-dependent setup times for their performance regarding mean setup time, mean flow time, mean tardiness and proportion of tardy jobs. The setup times are modelled using setup time matrices, and five different types of matrices are applied to assess the influence of this factor on the relative performance of a setup-oriented dispatching rule. Experimental results indicate that the choice of the best rule is often dependent on the setup time matrix structure. While good family-based rules exist for reducing the mean setup time and mean flow time, they are clearly outperformed by effective composite rules for due date-related criteria. Moreover, the better rules all seem to rely on queue information rather than only job attributes

Evolutionary search for difficult problem instances to support the design of job shop dispatching rules

Dispatching rules are simple scheduling heuristics that are widely applied in industrial practice. Their popularity can be attributed to their ability to flexibly react to shop floor disruptions that are prevalent in many real-world manufacturing environments. However, it is a challenging and time-consuming task to design local, decentralised dispatching rules that result in a good global performance of a complex shop. An evolutionary algorithm is developed to generate job shop problem instances for which an examined dispatching rule fails to achieve a good solution due to a single suboptimal decision. These instances can be easily analysed to reveal limitations of that rule which helps with the design of better rules. The method is applied to a job shop problem from the literature, resulting in new best dispatching rules for the mean flow time measure.Evolutionary computations Heuristics Scheduling Metaheuristics Distributed decision making

Generating dispatching rules for semiconductor manufacturing to minimize weighted tardiness

Dispatching rules play an important role especially in semiconductor manufacturing scheduling, because these fabrication facilities are characterized by high complexity and dynamics. The process of developing and adapting dispatching rules is currently a tedious, largely manual task. Coupling Genetic Programming (GP), a global optimization meta-heuristic from the family of Evolutionary Algorithms, with a stochastic discrete event simulation of a complex manufacturing system we are able to automatically generate dispatching rules for a scenario from semiconductor manufacturing. Evolved dispatching rules clearly outperform manually developed rules from literature

Evolutionary generation of dispatching rule sets for complex dynamic scheduling problems

We propose a two-stage hyper-heuristic for the generation of a set of work centre-specific dispatching rules. The approach combines a genetic programming (GP) algorithm that evolves a composite rule from basic job attributes with an evolutionary algorithm (EA) that searches for a good assignment of rules to work centres. The hyper-heuristic is tested against its two components and rules from the literature on a complex dynamic job shop problem from semiconductor manufacturing. Results show that all three hyper-heuristics are able to generate (sets of) rules that achieve a significantly lower mean weighted tardiness than any of the benckmark rules. Moreover, the two-stage approach proves to outperform the GP and EA hyper-heuristic as it optimises on two different heuristic search spaces that appear to tap different optimisation potentials. The resulting rule sets are also robust to most changes in the operating conditions